TOP voices from the independence movement have weighed in ahead of a major moment for the indyref2 campaign – as First Minister Nicola Sturgeon today publishes the first in a series of key papers.
The Building A New Scotland series will kick off in Edinburgh, with Scottish Greens co-leader and government minister Patrick Harvie alongside Sturgeon.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon to publish 'Building a New Scotland' paper on independence
We asked some of The National’s columnists to weigh in on a key question ahead of the unveiling of the “scene setter”: What will this series of papers on an independent Scotland need to do, in order to secure a Yes vote in indyref2?
Lesley Riddoch, Kevin McKenna, Pat Kane, Stuart Cosgrove and the Wee Ginger Dug have all given us their take.
Lesley Riddoch told us: “It’s been hard to be hopeful about a strong case for independence from the Scottish Government after long months and years of relative silence. And it’s still hard to see how the currency issue (amongst others) will be resolved along with a transfer of Section 30 powers.
“But listening to Nicola Sturgeon announce the launch of these papers on Radio Scotland on Monday night, I was struck by her determination and vigour – often more evidenced in relation to other issues.
“I think her opening salvo hit the right note by placing indyref2 amidst the urgent, critical decisions stacking up for Scotland to face – cost of living crisis, low growth, climate crisis, labour shortages and damaging Brexit – rather than sitting separately in opposition to them.
“It’s important to get this general point well made – as Nicola said: ‘The case for independence is not abstract or separate from the big challenges we face. It's how we best equip ourselves to navigate them and now is the best time to decide.’ “It would be ideal if the SNP was able to collaborate with the wider Yes movement in what happens next – perhaps they already have – but that’s generally not their style.
“So I’d like to suggest the main players in the Yes movement set up a meeting asap to decide on what activity we should undertake and when and to try and establish a regular point of contact with the SNP to stay abreast of future timing and strategy.
“I’m not certain yet that we are at a genuine new beginning for indy but I can certainly sense that something new is in the air.”
Kevin McKenna, meanwhile, questioned Greens co-leader Harvie’s presence at the event.
He said: “These papers must not simply be a re-hash of the self-evident truths that formed the backbone of the Yes campaign in 2014. We all know that other small nations have made a success of independence.
“The wider Yes movement needs to know that there's a detailed strategy and timeline for another referendum and, crucially, a legal strategy to counter Boris Johnson's expected refusal of a Section 30 order.
READ MORE: Scottish Tories respond to Nicola Sturgeon launching series of papers on independence
“Beyond that there must be clear detail on the currency issue and how sterlingisation works within the desire to gain membership of the EU. This can't simply be a wish-list.
“The presence of Patrick Harvie at the launch is curious. He's a divisive figure in the Yes movement and the Scottish Greens have never won a Holyrood seat. In government, he and his party co-leader have failed dismally to advance the Green agenda.”
Stuart Cosgrove kept his message simple on what the papers will have to achieve: “Remove doubt about pensions.”
Pat Kane called for a firm position to be maintained on removing nuclear weapons.
He said: “I hope for a vision of a state that intends to use all its powers to maximise the possibilities of our prodigious renewable energies, aimed at benefiting the majority of the Scottish population (not far-off elites).
“But I also hope that there’s some kind of narrative about the need for post-consumerism. The inevitably worsening global warming means we have to radically change, indeed revolutionise, our material (and materialist) lives in that respect.
“I would also love to see praise for community power and culture as part of that change. And I want no backsliding on the moral primacy of removing all installed or visiting nuclear weapons from Scottish land and maritime territories.”
The Wee Ginger Dug, aka Paul Kavanagh, feels the move by the First Minister is a timely one.
He told The National: “As long as we remain a part of this so-called union, Scotland’s international standing and reputation is being rubbished too as Johnson breaks international law in the name of British exceptionalism. “It doesn’t have to be like this, but if Scotland doesn’t choose independence in order to define itself and what it stands for, Boris Johnson will define Scotland to the world for us.
“The First Minister’s announcement that the second independence referendum campaign launches with the publication of the first in a series of papers setting out a new prospectus for independence and setting out a Scottish definition of what Scotland could be could not be more timely.
“It’s time for Scotland to define itself.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel