NMP awarded Sellafield contract extension
Last updated at 15:37, Monday, 07 October 2013
NUCLEAR Management Partners (NMP) has had its contract to run the Sellafield site extended for a further five years.
Site owners, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA), announced this afternoon that it will grant NMP a second five-year period to run the nuclear site.
The NDA initially granted NMP – a consortium led by the American URS Corporation alongside the British engineering group Amec and the French nuclear business Areva – a 17-year £22bn contract to run Sellafield from 2009. The contract had a break clause after five years, which the NDA has decided not to activate.
The newly-granted extension will run from March 2014 to March 2019.
John Clarke, NDA’s chief executive officer, said: “Sellafield is by far the most complex and challenging site in our portfolio, and we are determined to drive improved performance at the site.
“We have reviewed progress under the contract to date and concluded that the right decision is to extend the contract to give NMP further time to bring about the improvements in capability and performance at the site that we and they are looking for.
“Both NMP and the NDA now have a much better understanding of the issues and complexities that exist at the site and the challenges that lie ahead.
“Whilst progress is being made on a number of fronts we will require significant improvements during the next period. We have had extensive discussions with NMP and made clear where these improvements must be made.
“We will continue to monitor performance closely and remain focused on achieving our goal of safe, effective, value for money decommissioning at Sellafield – as we are seeing elsewhere across our portfolio of sites.
“We look forward to working with the Sellafield management team to support them in the successful implementation of their plans and we remain committed to exploring ways to maximise the local economic benefits of the enormous £1.8 billion annual expenditure programme at the site.”
Baroness Verma, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC), said: “Sellafield remains the Government’s top priority in our nuclear decommissioning programme. We support this decision to extend the contract which will build on skills and expertise at the site and the progress made so far.”
Tom Zarges, chairman of NMP, said: “The task at Sellafield is unprecedented. We have learnt an enormous amount about the challenges of the site and the areas that we need to focus on looking forward.
“We believe we are well placed to build on our progress to date and deliver improved performance in the next period.”
First published at 13:00, Friday, 04 October 2013
Published by http://www.whitehavennews.co.uk
Have your say
The NDA were between a rock and a hard place in deciding on the award of an extension to NMP. The NDA probably does not have the resources to directly assume the management of the Sellafield site and there was no time to negotiate with a new contractor. The flaw was in the award of the initial contract and the fact that we are stuck with it for a further 5 years is galling. In this period the NDA must rigorously monitor NMP and ensure that improvements occur. The NDA must also develop a contingency plan for the early replacement of NMP in the event of further failings. The sad truth is that the US group involved do not have the skills to successfully deliver all that is required of them. I had personal experience of the management of a nuclear site in the US some years ago and I was not impressed either with the quality of management or basic project management. Obviously there were some very able people but sadly I do not think they have been allocated to NMP.
Dear Sellafield Worker, it sounds like you need to do a bit of 'Whistle Blowing' to the nearest Health and Safety Executive office. Dear NDA it sounds like you need to replace your Contracts and Procurement Team if you are not getting Value For Money. The Terms & Conditions appear as though you could drive a bus through them. Where are the incentives or penalties for quality and poor performance respectively?
View all 7 comments on this article