Fluoride on tap plan mooted
Last updated at 10:03, Thursday, 07 August 2008
HEALTH bosses are considering the potential for fluoridation of public water supplies to improve the dental health of people in Cumbria.
Already around 130,000 people in West Cumbria – including in Whitehaven and Workington – receive fluoridated water.
Primary Care Trusts in the North West are being asked whether they want the issue of water fluoridation to be explored further by the regional health authority.
NHS Cumbria (the new name for Cumbria Primary Care Trust) has to decide whether it would like full proposals to be developed for a scheme which would enable water supplies to areas of Cumbria to be fluoridated.
If PCTs across the North West indicate they would like a scheme to be set up then proposals would be put together and go out for public consultation.
Eric Rooney, consultant in dental public health for NHS Cumbria, said that the North West, as a whole, has a problem with dental disease, particularly in children.
He said a fluoridation evaluation group was set up to look at levels of disease, look at practicalities of a potential scheme and examine the evidence around what benefits it would offer.
That report is now being considered by health chiefs.
It states that in Cumbria in 2005/06, 42 per cent of five-year-old children were affected by tooth decay.
And in Copeland in 2005/06, 45 per cent of five-year-olds had one or more decayed, missing or filled teeth.
Data looked at from other areas “suggests that fluoridation of water supplies does reduce caries (tooth decay) prevalence”. And that introducing water fluoridation would “substantially reduce” inequalities in dental health.
A number of studies conclude that the more deprived an area, the greater the benefit derived from fluoridation.
But it seems more recent studies seem to find a lower potential benefit.
In Cumbria during a set period a similar percentage of children had tooth decay in the non-fluoridated parts of the county compared to the fluoridated area. But fluoridation was said to be intermittent, with periods of years when no fluoride was added.
Many people are against fluoridation of water because of potential risks such as fluorosis (white marks in teeth).
In the report, evidence suggests that in the vast majority of cases this is mild and did not constitute a public health problem.
Cumbrians Against Fluoridation has been campaigning for eight years against what it claims is the use of an untested, unresearched chemical in the area’s drinking water.
They question the logic of adding fluoride to the water supply instead of letting people get it by brushing their teeth.
First published at 16:04, Wednesday, 06 August 2008
Published by http://www.whitehavennews.co.uk
Many respected scientists have called fluoridation a fraud and the EPA headquarters Union President made that statement when they sued to end fluoridation in 1986 for being violating the safe drinking water act. In 2000 they again asked congress for immediate moratorium and investigations. 2005 11 EPA Unions asked again to congress for immediate halt and goal of ZERO just like lead and arsenic. The number is 19 EPA scientist unions as of feb 29 2008. That is the majority of the EPA scientists who think fluoridation a fraud with no ingested benefit just harm. Verify for yourself and hear the request at fluoridealert.org or waterloowatch.com for short videos by the top researchers. Not the total fraud of the long list of endorsers who just follow the leader with little research. Lawsuits are now starting on kidney damage,infant overdose and childhood bone cancer. This is just the start of the ugly truth the so called experts say does not exist. Did they overlook the 19 EPA unions by accident? The current science and the majority of developed countries know how stupid the policy is. Read a little learn a lot or just listen to a couple short videos. A large international conference is going on in Toronto on the dangers to our health. Proven risks no lies by government so called experts that read the comic book version with no science just to keep their jobs. Jim Schultz
View all 6 comments on this article






Have your say
Fluoride is not necessary and should be resisted. A better solution might be access to an NHS dentist for everyone, but this feckless government don't seem to realise that.
Posted by Richard Cook on 11 August 2008 at 19:27